Case
Study #9 The Case of the Stakeholder Schisms Creating
Alignment in a Non-Profit Organization
|
The Situation: Stakeholders Pulling in Different Directions |
| The
Alliance for Children's Rights is Los Angeles County's only non-profit free legal
services organization devoted solely to protecting the rights of impoverished
and abused children. Serving nearly 5,000 children annually, the Alliance has
programs serving children who need adoptive families, are in the foster care system,
need health care coverage and services, have learning or developmental disabilities,
are mentally ill or had behavioral disorders, and those who are homeless or runaways. |
| In
October 2002 Ms. Janis Spire became Executive Director of The Alliance for Children's
Rights, replacing a charismatic director and highly successful fundraiser. The
new Director faced multiple challenges. Many of the Alliance's programs had been
created based on the availability of funding rather than a coordinated long-term
plan, and thus were not as connected or complementary as might be desired. There
was disagreement whether the organization should have a national or local focus.
The Board and staff each felt not fully understood or appreciated by the other. |
The Goals: Get the Stakeholders Aligned on a Common Plan |
| Ms.
Spire engaged Frontier Associates to assist the organization in developing and
implementing a plan to resolve these challenges. Her goals were to: |
| | Get
the Board and the staff in agreement and focused on a clear purpose and a consistent
long-term plan for the organization. |
| | Resolve
the disparate programs in which the Alliance had gotten involved. |
| | Identify
areas for growth and development. |
| | Establish
a balance of work that served the needs of individual children as well as the
need for system wide change. |
| | Resolve
whether the Alliance was a Los Angeles County or national organization. |
| | Keep
the Board engaged and active in securing resources. |
| In
addition, since Ms. Spire was new on the job, it was important to her that the
Board view whatever was done as having been highly successful. |
The FAI Solution: Use Strategic Planning to Generate Alignment |
| We
recommended that The Alliance do two things to resolve the issues it faced: |
| | Create
a purpose and future goals for the organization that would generate passion and
unity, and |
| | Create
a long-term strategic plan for accomplishing these goals that would coalesce and
focus the organization on its long-term and near-term priorities. |
Non-profit
organizations have particular issues stemming from their high dependence on volunteers
and contributions. Forming and implementing a cohesive and consistent strategic
plan is especially difficult in the face of multiple strong points of view from
influential and powerful parties. Thus we recommended that all Board and all staff
members (a total of about 35 people) participate in a Strategic Planning Workshop.
|
| To
help generate the needed agreement on organizational priorities and future plans
the workshop would use Frontier Associates' proprietary approach to strategic
planning called "Designing the Future from the Future".1
This approach has the following unique characteristics: |
| | The
group agrees that as a group it will be accountable both for designing the future
of the organization and for the implementation and fulfillment of the future they
create. |
| | All
decisions are made by consensus - there is a decision only if every participant
agrees on the same alternative as being the best solution with no compromise.
In other words, every participant has a veto. This generates a much higher level
of listening to others' point of view, and much more creative solutions. In addition,
the final plan has the complete support of everyone in the organization, thus
substantially increasing its chances of being implemented. |
| | Little
time is spent on analyzing the present or the past, and there is no attempt to
reach agreement on the present or past. |
| | The
process starts with the end-point, the ultimate purpose of the organization, and
works backwards to the present. |
| | The
plan includes outcomes for all groups that have a stake in the organization's
future, i.e., clients, owners, employees, and the community. |
| | A
structure of support is created that increases the probability that the plan will
actually be implemented. |
The Results: A Board and Staff in Alignment |
| As
a result of the strategic planning exercise, the Board and the Staff are in much
greater alignment and are working cooperatively on an inspiring and common future. |
| | Both
Board and staff expressed a greater appreciation for the roles and circumstances
of the other, generating a much more cooperative environment. |
| | Because
the plan was their creation, with every individual playing a role, rather than
the creation of an independent consultant, buy-in was easier to achieve and universal. |
| | Starting
from the future and working backwards was a major factor in being able to create
consensus. |
| | Present
day actions must be linked to the source of passion, the vision and mission, to
generate enthusiasm and personal commitment. A strategic goal of only 3-5 years
is unlikely to indicate sufficient progress to connect to a powerful vision. In
contrast, the Alliance said it would take at least 30 years to make satisfactory
progress on accomplishing its vision. A strategic plan of this duration enabled
people to connect their present day actions to the accomplishment of what they
care about, the vision.2 |
| | The
process took a relatively short time. The initial design meeting took one day,
followed by one afternoon meeting a few weeks later and smaller group meetings
to refine the material. |
| | Since
they had played a major role in development, the Board formally approved and the
staff informally approved the plan with a high degree of alignment. |
| | The
staff's subsequent thinking tended to include more long-term perspectives. |
| | The
clear organizational purpose provided a context and the strategic plan provided
clear guidance for which programs should be emphasized and which should be transferred
elsewhere. In particular, the organization decided to focus on Los Angeles County. |
Summary |
| Today,
the Board and the staff are working as teammates, together fulfilling a future
about which they all are passionate. Their goals are now clear and priorities
are more easily set and adhered to. |
| A
year after the strategic planning session, the Alliance Board Chair said: |
| "The
Future from the Future process helped us reach a place we had been trying to get
to for several years. It provided the spark that took us to a new level. The result
is a strategic plan that we use consistently to guide our decision-making. We
have also found it easier to set new goals because the plan provides a strong
foundation to build on." |
| -------- |
1.
Additional information concerning the Designing the Future from the Future approach
may be accessed at the Frontier Associates web site at www.frontier-assoc.com.
2.An excerpt from The Alliance's strategic plan may be seen in Strategic
Planning #9: An Example Strategic Plan. |
Article version 1.0 © 2004 Frontier Associates, Inc. Permission
is granted to reprint and distribute this article provided that the copyright
and source information are included. |